Blog

  • RIL Newsletter #2025-11

    RIL Newsletter #2025-11

    Welcome to Resilience Innovation Lab (RIL). Before going into this month’s newsletter, we would like to offer our heartfelt condolences to the families and loved ones affected by last month’s Wang Fuk Court fire in Tai Po District, Hong Kong. Our thoughts are with the community during this time of sorrow and loss.

    In this newsletter, we will share updates on the community’s efforts to document the Wang Fuk Court fire and the government’s response in Hong Kong, along with RIL’s Christmas good-read list for 2025.

    As we approach the Christmas season and the year’s end, RIL extends its wishes for rest, reflection, and renewed strength. This period reminds us of the importance of resilience, solidarity, and care for one another, especially in times of hardship. RIL remains committed to advancing human rights and collective wellbeing through uses of technology, and to standing with communities working toward a more just and humane future.

    After the Wang Fuk Court Fire, Accountability Came Under Pressure

    During the Wang Fuk Court fire in Hong Kong, members of the public began documenting information related to the incident. As a result of these efforts, multiple websites and online resources were set up and shared on social media for different purposes, including

    monitoring, investigation, and censorship prevention. After the fire, a university student launched a petition with “four demands,” including the establishment of an independent Commission of Inquiry. The petition gathered over 10,000 signatures before being cracked down on by the Hong Kong Police. An identical petition was launched by another individual after the initiator of the original petition was arrested, which has also gathered over 10,000 signatures so far.

    The Hong Kong government subsequently began to silence individuals who demanded accountability. The National Security Department of the Hong Kong Police arrested multiple people on charges of sedition, including the initiator of the petition, a former district councillor, and a volunteer. Prominent figures who shared and commented on news and developments related to the fire on social media announced that they would stop posting about the incident, indicating that they had faced pressure from the authorities. The pro-democracy political party Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People’s Livelihood (ADPL) cancelled its press conference on high-rise building maintenance policy after the party’s chair was taken away by national security police.

    Beijing’s Office for Safeguarding National Security in Hong Kong also summoned foreign media outlets and issued warnings against what it described as “false information” or “smearing” of the government’s response to the fire.

    The crackdown indicates that Hong Kong’s governance model has shifted toward prioritising stability and order over truth and accountability. The rapid and harsh response from the authorities also reflects that censorship-resistant technologies have become increasingly important for documentation and archiving in post–National Security Law Hong Kong.

    Christmas Good Reads 2025

    As the year draws to a close, Christmas offers a rare opportunity to slow down, reflect, and read with intention. This year’s Christmas Good Reads bring together books that go beyond surface-level trends, exploring the deeper ideas shaping our technologies, financial systems, and societies.

    From the evolution of the internet to the social implications of blockchain, power, ownership, and collective imagination, these titles invite us to think critically about where we have come from—and where we may be heading next. Whether you are encountering these ideas for the first time or looking to deepen your understanding, each book offers something thoughtful, enduring, and worth sitting with over the holidays.

    1. Read Write Own — Chris Dixon

    Chris Dixon is a veteran Silicon Valley investor who has been involved in the development of the internet since its earliest Web1 days. He is among the rare few who have personally witnessed—and actively participated in—all three generations of the web’s evolution. In Read Write Own, Dixon revisits the history of the internet in a clear, accessible, and grounded style, showing how the Web2 era gradually drifted away from the original ideal of the free flow of information due to excessive centralisation.

    He goes on to explain how blockchain technology introduces an entirely new “ownership layer” to the internet—one that allows users not only to read and write, but to genuinely own the value and identity they create online. This book is ideal for readers who enjoy understanding technology through a historical lens, as well as for those curious about blockchain but keen to avoid being overwhelmed by jargon. Offering a lucid and inspiring vision of the internet’s future, it is a must-read work of technological reflection.

    2. Check Your Financial Privilege — Alex Gladstein

    The phrase “check your privilege” emerged from recent progressive movements as a reminder to consider how one’s background, resources, and social position shape one’s understanding of public issues. In Check Your Financial Privilege, Alex Gladstein, Chief Strategy Officer at the Human Rights Foundation, extends this idea further—urging readers to re-examine not only social identity, but also financial privilege.

    Gladstein points out that only around 20 per cent of the world’s population is fortunate enough to be born in countries with strong reserve currencies. In many other parts of the world, people are forced to contend with hyperinflation, corrupt regimes, and capital controls. The book also introduces the concept of “economic terrorism”, describing how authoritarian governments use extreme measures to punish citizens who hold foreign currencies, thereby reinforcing political control.

    Through extensive first-hand interviews, Gladstein illustrates how activists across the globe are using Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as tools to resist authoritarianism, corruption, and neo-colonial power structures. Requiring no technical background, this is a sincere and compelling book that anyone concerned with economic justice and human rights should read.

    3. The Infinite Machine: How an Army of Crypto-hackers Is Building the Next Internet with Ethereum — Camila Russo

    Written by journalist Camila Russo, The Infinite Machine draws on incisive reporting and rigorous field research to take readers inside one of the most disruptive technological innovations of the past decade: the birth of Ethereum. Rich in first-hand interviews with core developers—including co-founder Vitalik Buterin—the book documents a technological revolution while reading like a fast-paced novel: gripping, vivid, and highly accessible.

    With 2025 marking Ethereum’s tenth anniversary, the book feels especially timely. No prior knowledge of blockchain is required; the power of the story itself carries the reader along. Russo clearly articulates her aim:

    “My intention is that anyone, anywhere, will be able to pick this up, without prior knowledge of blockchain technology, and be captivated by a fascinating story: an idealistic hero, his band of misfits, and the challenges they face to make their incredibly ambitious dream a reality.”

    More than a history of technology, The Infinite Machine is an adventure about ideals, rebellion, collaboration, and the creation of the future. For readers interested in technology, finance, or social innovation, it remains one of the most rewarding books to revisit at this milestone moment.

    4. The Sociology of Blockchain: Reimagining Money, Media and Democracy — Kin Ko

    While the previous titles largely come from the English-speaking world, the Chinese-language sphere has its own influential voice: Kin Ko, founder of DHK DAO and LikeCoin. The Sociology of Blockchain: Reimagining Money, Media and Democracy is widely regarded as a foundational introduction to blockchain thinking within the Chinese-speaking world.

    This is not simply a book about technology; it is a book written for everyone. As Kin Ko himself puts it, it is written for all the “Muggles” of the world. Even without any technical background, readers can gain a clear understanding of how blockchain is deeply intertwined with monetary systems, media ecosystems, and democratic institutions. At the same time, readers already familiar with the technology will find the book rich in insights that prompt reflection and renewed perspective.

    Full of vision and critical awareness, the book reveals new ideas and fresh inspiration each time it is revisited. If you wish to understand the social questions blockchain is genuinely attempting to address—rather than focusing solely on technical mechanisms—this book is an ideal entry point, and one well worth returning to.

    5. Proof of Stake — Vitalik Buterin

    For readers ready to go beyond introductory material while still valuing clarity and thoughtfulness, Proof of Stake is essential reading. Written and curated by Vitalik Buterin himself, this collection brings together years of blog posts and speeches, carefully organised to guide readers through his broader thinking on Ethereum, crypto-networks, and the future of society.

    Unlike conventional blockchain books, Proof of Stake serves as a window into the mind of a technological innovator, revealing how Vitalik analyses the complex relationships between social institutions, economic incentives, governance models, and technological evolution. His writing remains characteristically calm, rigorous, and deeply insightful, reading like an extended conversation that moves from Proof of Stake and Ethereum governance to wider reflections on human coordination and digital futures.

    This book is particularly suited to readers who are no longer satisfied with surface-level explanations and want to engage more deeply with the philosophy and vision behind Ethereum and blockchain. It is not a dense technical manual, but a collection of ideas that may fundamentally reshape how you think about decentralisation, public goods, and the digital societies yet to come.

    Useful Resources

    Judicial Records in Hong Kong * has made every effort to collect court decisions related to the Anti-Extradition Bill Movement for educational and research purposes. These records are still accessible on the website of Hong Kong’s judiciary, but their continued availability to the public in the future remains uncertain. All judicial records collected and displayed here are secured and maintained using blockchain technology, through which they are decentralized and immutable, ensuring transparency, tamper-resistance, and trust in the integrity of the data. Our goal is to utilize blockchain as a form of censorship resistance to preserve invaluable public records. If there are any omissions in this database, please feel free to notify RIL’s research team: info.dap@protonmail.com .

    China Open Courts * aims to preserve and provide public access to judicial records from the People’s Republic of China that are at risk of disappearing from official sources. Below is an overview of the methodology adopted in this project, including our data collection strategies, scope of coverage, and plans for ensuring continued accuracy and relevance of the information. Interested parties are welcome to reach out to our team at chinaopencourts@protonmail.com for further information, collaboration opportunities, or suggestions on additional keywords and topics to include.

    *To protect your identity and personal information, you are advised to use these online resources with an encrypted device and VPN.

    An Unbreakable Wall? Challenges and Opportunities of Defending Freedom of Information in China is RIL’s first research report on information environment in China. This report provides a comprehensive account of China’s information environment under the rule of the CCP. Drawing on evidence-based insights from multiple perspectives, the report seeks to inform a broad range of stakeholders—from policymakers and international businesses to civil society organisations and academic institutions—and encourages collaborative efforts to address the challenges posed by China’s information landscape and its impact on global information networks. The full report is now available on our website.

    Safeguarding Freedom of Information in Hong Kong: Challenges, Opportunities and Remedies is RIL’s second research report, focuding on information freedom in Hong Kong. The report systematically outlines how Hong Kong’s information access environment has been significantly constrained since the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law (HKNSL) in 2020 and the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (SNSO) in 2024. These measures have severely curtailed press freedom and undermined the ability of civil society to hold the government accountable. They have encouraged the withholding of publicly available data and represent a departure from international human rights standards. Access to and dissemination of information is increasingly criminalised, resulting in diminished government transparency, suppression of the media, and reduced accessibility to data for businesses. The repercussions are being felt by journalists, the business sector, researchers, and international organisations alike. The report is published bilingually on our website.

    Who we are?

    Resilience Innovation Lab (RIL) was founded by Asian veteran researchers and human rights defenders in 2023. RIL is a virtual platform promoting innovation, experimentation, and the exchange of research and educational initiatives that aim to develop and strengthen the democratic and digital resilience of organisations and individuals working in repressive environments.

    RIL envisions a synergy of democracy, technology and civil society resilience today, especially when authoritarianism emerges as a common threat to liberal democracies and open societies. Building the capacities of citizens and civil groups to respond to such a new environment with creative and innovative instruments is of paramount importance for their sustainable development.

    Our work focuses on researching Web3 technology, digital preservation of collective memory and history in conflict and post-conflict areas, and resilience of rule of law institutions and cultures in non-democratic regimes.

    Enquiry: info.ril@proton.me

  • RIL Newsletter #2025-10

    RIL Newsletter #2025-10

    Welcome to Resilience Innovation Lab (RIL) ! In this newsletter, we will share our latest updates and the latest development of information access in Hong Kong, along with opportunities from the global community on archives, memory activism, and technology-facilitated human rights initiatives.

    International Archives Congress 2025 @Barcelona

    Promotional banner for the International Archives Congress titled “ICA Barcelona 2025 – Knowing Pasts, Creating Futures,” showing the event dates 27–30 October 2025 and location at the Barcelona International Convention Centre (CCIB), with a purple-blue background and the ICA logo.

    In October 2025, RIL attended the International Archives Congress in Barcelona. Every four years, the International Council on Archives (ICA) hosts its Congress — a major gathering that brings together members of the archival community from around the world. The event served as a dynamic platform for professionals, academics, and practitioners to exchange ideas, foster discussion, and build international collaboration. It also offered an opportunity for archive and records management experts to connect directly with professionals from related industries, such as artificial intelligence, data management, digitisation, digital preservation, electronic archiving, and document processing, among many others.

    RIL participated in panel discussions and workshops that delved into key themes such as the ethics of archival access, community-driven preservation, and the role of archives in documenting histories of displacement and resistance. RIL also learned the potential applications of emerging AI technologies in archival practice and gained insights from international experts on safeguarding archival collections and planning for emergencies. Participation in the Congress offered RIL a meaningful opportunity to place its work on Hong Kong archives within a wider global context.

    RTHK’s Removal of Archived Programmes from University Libraries Sparks Concerns Over Public Access

    The exterior wall of Radio Television Hong Kong (RTHK) headquarters, displaying large gold-coloured lettering in both English and Chinese that reads “RADIO TELEVISION HONG KONG” and “香港電台.”

    Multiple local chinese news outlets in Hong Kong reported that Hong Kong’s public broadcaster RTHK has requested local universities to remove its archived television programmes from their library collections, ending long-standing access to series such as City Forum, Below the Lion Rock and The Hong Kong Connection.

    Institutions including the Education University of Hong Kong, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and the University of Hong Kong confirmed that their RTHK holdings have been taken offline, citing the expiry of copyright exemptions.

    The move has raised concerns about access to public information and historical material, particularly for academics researching Hong Kong’s social and political history.

    The Hong Kong government defended the decision, stating that the broadcaster must comply with copyright rules and that programme access remains available through RTHK’s official platforms within a 12-month window.

    However, the Hong Kong Journalists Association criticised the decision as self-censorship and a barrier to scholarly research, arguing that content funded by taxpayers should remain publicly accessible. Its chairperson, Selina Cheng, stated that an open and confident government would treat publicly funded media as part of the public domain, accessible to all for study and reference.

    Funding Opportunities

    We’re happy to share ongoing and new funding opportunities from the global archiving and Web3 communities. Take a look at the details below—you may find something valuable for your work.

    The National Archives (UK):  Records at Risk Grants | Archives Revealed

    ACLS Digital Justice Grants (US)

    National Lottery Heritage Grants (UK)

    Bitcoin Development Fund, Human Rights Foundation (US)

    Upcoming Events

    We’re excited to share a selection of upcoming events exploring digital archiving, technology, human rights, and civil society. These gatherings are independently organised and not hosted by RIL, but we think they may be of interest to our community.

    Digital Preservation Summit 2026

    The Digital Preservation Summit 2026 will take place virtually on 5 February 2026, alongside the DAM & Museums 2026 event. Bringing together professionals from galleries, libraries, archives, museums, academic institutions and corporate collections, the summit will focus on one of the most pressing challenges of our time — ensuring the long-term preservation and accessibility of digital heritage. Participants will explore both fundamental and advanced principles of digital preservation, from assessing an organisation’s digital maturity to developing effective metadata strategies and sustainable workflows. Sessions will also examine how emerging technologies can strengthen preservation efforts and how institutions can future-proof their digital assets amid rapid technological change. Attendees will benefit from expert presentations, live Q&A sessions, networking opportunities and tailored vendor exhibitions, with access to event recordings available on demand.

    Details of the event can be found here.

    The 2026 General Assembly (GA) & Web Archiving Conference (WAC)

    The General Assembly & Web Archiving Conference 2026, jointly organised by the International Internet Preservation Consortium (IIPC) and the KBR (Royal Library of Belgium), will take place in Brussels from 20 to 23 April 2026. The event begins with pre-conference workshops and a symposium on 20 April, followed by the main conference on 21–22 April, and concludes with the General Assembly on 23 April. The focus will be on the growing web-archiving community and how its work can become sustainable across technical, social, legal and environmental dimensions — covering areas such as tools and infrastructure, inclusive collection development, legal and ethical challenges, access and research use, policies and standards, and the environmental impact of web-archiving. This is an excellent opportunity for professionals in archives, libraries, digital preservation and documentation to engage with global peers, exchange ideas and stay at the forefront of web-archiving innovation.

    RightsCon Summit 2026 Zambia

    The 14th edition of the world’s leading summit on human rights in the digital age, will take place in Lusaka, Zambia and online, from Tuesday, May 5 to Friday, May 8, 2026. The organisers are incredibly excited to bring back RightsCon to the African continent since RightsCon Tunis in 2019, and to host their first-ever summit in Southern Africa! The return to Africa carries deep significance. It was a commitment they made after RightsCon Costa Rica in 2023, to bring RightsCon to the continent, and spotlight the strength, resilience, and global significance of Africa’s digital rights community.

    Details of the upcoming programme can be found here.

    Useful Resources

    Judicial Records in Hong Kong * has made every effort to collect court decisions related to the Anti-Extradition Bill Movement for educational and research purposes. These records are still accessible on the website of Hong Kong’s judiciary, but their continued availability to the public in the future remains uncertain. All judicial records collected and displayed here are secured and maintained using blockchain technology, through which they are decentralized and immutable, ensuring transparency, tamper-resistance, and trust in the integrity of the data. Our goal is to utilize blockchain as a form of censorship resistance to preserve invaluable public records. If there are any omissions in this database, please feel free to notify RIL’s research team: info.dap@protonmail.com .

    China Open Courts * aims to preserve and provide public access to judicial records from the People’s Republic of China that are at risk of disappearing from official sources. Below is an overview of the methodology adopted in this project, including our data collection strategies, scope of coverage, and plans for ensuring continued accuracy and relevance of the information. Interested parties are welcome to reach out to our team at chinaopencourts@protonmail.com for further information, collaboration opportunities, or suggestions on additional keywords and topics to include.

    *To protect your identity and personal information, you are advised to use these online resources with an encrypted device and VPN.

    An Unbreakable Wall? Challenges and Opportunities of Defending Freedom of Information in China is RIL’s first research report on information environment in China. This report provides a comprehensive account of China’s information environment under the rule of the CCP. Drawing on evidence-based insights from multiple perspectives, the report seeks to inform a broad range of stakeholders—from policymakers and international businesses to civil society organisations and academic institutions—and encourages collaborative efforts to address the challenges posed by China’s information landscape and its impact on global information networks. The full report is now available on our website.

    Safeguarding Freedom of Information in Hong Kong: Challenges, Opportunities and Remedies is RIL’s second research report, focuding on information freedom in Hong Kong. The report systematically outlines how Hong Kong’s information access environment has been significantly constrained since the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law (HKNSL) in 2020 and the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (SNSO) in 2024. These measures have severely curtailed press freedom and undermined the ability of civil society to hold the government accountable. They have encouraged the withholding of publicly available data and represent a departure from international human rights standards. Access to and dissemination of information is increasingly criminalised, resulting in diminished government transparency, suppression of the media, and reduced accessibility to data for businesses. The repercussions are being felt by journalists, the business sector, researchers, and international organisations alike. The report is published bilingually on our website.

    Who we are?

    Resilience Innovation Lab (RIL) was founded by Asian veteran researchers and human rights defenders in 2023. RIL is a virtual platform promoting innovation, experimentation, and the exchange of research and educational initiatives that aim to develop and strengthen the democratic and digital resilience of organisations and individuals working in repressive environments.

    RIL envisions a synergy of democracy, technology and civil society resilience today, especially when authoritarianism emerges as a common threat to liberal democracies and open societies. Building the capacities of citizens and civil groups to respond to such a new environment with creative and innovative instruments is of paramount importance for their sustainable development.

    Our work focuses on researching Web3 technology, digital preservation of collective memory and history in conflict and post-conflict areas, and resilience of rule of law institutions and cultures in non-democratic regimes.

    Enquiry: info.ril@proton.me

  • RIL Newsletter #2025-9

    RIL Newsletter #2025-9

    Welcome to Resilience Innovation Lab (RIL) ! We hope you had an enjoyable summer 🌞.

    After a two-month break, we are delighted to share our latest updates in this newsletter, along with new opportunities from the global community on archives, memory activism, and technology-facilitated human rights initiatives.

    Global Gathering 2025 @Portugal

    In September 2025, RIL attended the Global Gathering (GG) in Portugal. GG brought together digital rights defenders from over 144 countries for three days of collaboration building, knowledge sharing, brainstorming, and rejuvenation. These were individuals working on the most pressing challenges arising at the intersection of human rights, social justice and technology, such as online security for civil society.

    RIL hosted a booth titled “Archiving Against Erasure: Hands-On Tools for Preserving Public Data under Authoritarian Regimes via Blockchain Technologies“. We explained the reasons why archiving work becomes an urgent tasks for civil society actors struggling in repressive regimes, and showcased how blockchain technologies can enable rights defenders to preserve public data from censorship and erasure. We thank all attendees who shared their feedback and recommendations for us to improve our work, and who expressed interests in future collaboration.

    To know more about our analysis, rationale and appraoches to developing censorship-resistant archiving, read our training manual here (Traditional Chinese only).

    Funding Opportunities

    We’re happy to share ongoing and new funding opportunities from the global archiving and Web3 communities. Take a look at the details below—you may find something valuable for your work.

    The National Archives (UK):  Records at Risk Grants | Resilience Grants

    National Lottery Heritage Grants (UK)

    Bitcoin Development Fund, Human Rights Foundation (US)

    Upcoming Events

    We’re excited to share a selection of upcoming events exploring digital archiving, technology, human rights, and civil society. These gatherings are independently organised and not hosted by RIL, but we think they may be of interest to our community.

    Copyright Issues for Digital Archivists / Asuntos de Derechos de Autor para Archivistas Digitales

    Understanding and using copyright law and principles is an important part of an archivist’s work. This workshop covers the foundations of copyright law, including a copyright owner’s exclusive rights, copyright duration and transfers, public domain, derivatives, fair use and archives/library exemptions, orphan works, permissions, and takedown policies.  We also will briefly touch on aspects of moral rights, character rights, music, copyright termination, cultural heritage and traditional knowledge, contracts, trademarks, and alternatives to copyright.  Throughout we will focus on digital works and uses, including developing and using good copyright policies, best practices, and tools in managing copyright, and assessing and minimizing risks in creating and using digital works.  Participants will gain an understanding of the law and best practices, and learn about practical methods and tools to better manage work, assist users, and understand and mitigate risk to avoid copyright infringement claims.

    RSVP here.

    International Archives Congress Barcelona 2025

    Every four years, the International Council on Archives (ICA) organises a Congress, in association with the local institutions of the bidder selected to act as Congress host. Congresses are the major events for ICA in that the first few days are the opportunity to hold a series of governance meetings, and the rest of the week is devoted to Congress talks, sessions, workshops and meetings, all on the basis of a professional programme drawn up by the Congress Programme Committee.

    Registration details can be found here.

    RightsCon Summit 2026 Zambia

    The 14th edition of the world’s leading summit on human rights in the digital age, will take place in Lusaka, Zambia and online, from Tuesday, May 5 to Friday, May 8, 2026. The organisers are incredibly excited to bring back RightsCon to the African continent since RightsCon Tunis in 2019, and to host their first-ever summit in Southern Africa! The return to Africa carries deep significance. It was a commitment they made after RightsCon Costa Rica in 2023, to bring RightsCon to the continent, and spotlight the strength, resilience, and global significance of Africa’s digital rights community.

    Details of the upcoming program can be found here.

    Useful Resources

    Judicial Records in Hong Kong * has made every effort to collect court decisions related to the Anti-Extradition Bill Movement for educational and research purposes. These records are still accessible on the website of Hong Kong’s judiciary, but their continued availability to the public in the future remains uncertain. All judicial records collected and displayed here are secured and maintained using blockchain technology, through which they are decentralized and immutable, ensuring transparency, tamper-resistance, and trust in the integrity of the data. Our goal is to utilize blockchain as a form of censorship resistance to preserve invaluable public records. If there are any omissions in this database, please feel free to notify RIL’s research team: info.dap@protonmail.com .

    China Open Courts * aims to preserve and provide public access to judicial records from the People’s Republic of China that are at risk of disappearing from official sources. Below is an overview of the methodology adopted in this project, including our data collection strategies, scope of coverage, and plans for ensuring continued accuracy and relevance of the information. Interested parties are welcome to reach out to our team at chinaopencourts@protonmail.com for further information, collaboration opportunities, or suggestions on additional keywords and topics to include.

    *To protect your identity and personal information, you are advised to use these online resources with an encrypted device and VPN.

    An Unbreakable Wall? Challenges and Opportunities of Defending Freedom of Information in China is RIL’s first research report on information environment in China. This report provides a comprehensive account of China’s information environment under the rule of the CCP. Drawing on evidence-based insights from multiple perspectives, the report seeks to inform a broad range of stakeholders—from policymakers and international businesses to civil society organisations and academic institutions—and encourages collaborative efforts to address the challenges posed by China’s information landscape and its impact on global information networks. The full report is now available on our website.

    Safeguarding Freedom of Information in Hong Kong: Challenges, Opportunities and Remedies is RIL’s second research report, focuding on information freedom in Hong Kong. The report systematically outlines how Hong Kong’s information access environment has been significantly constrained since the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law (HKNSL) in 2020 and the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (SNSO) in 2024. These measures have severely curtailed press freedom and undermined the ability of civil society to hold the government accountable. They have encouraged the withholding of publicly available data and represent a departure from international human rights standards. Access to and dissemination of information is increasingly criminalised, resulting in diminished government transparency, suppression of the media, and reduced accessibility to data for businesses. The repercussions are being felt by journalists, the business sector, researchers, and international organisations alike. The report is published bilingually on our website.

    Who we are?

    Resilience Innovation Lab (RIL) was founded by Asian veteran researchers and human rights defenders in 2023. RIL is a virtual platform promoting innovation, experimentation, and the exchange of research and educational initiatives that aim to develop and strengthen the democratic and digital resilience of organisations and individuals working in repressive environments.

    RIL envisions a synergy of democracy, technology and civil society resilience today, especially when authoritarianism emerges as a common threat to liberal democracies and open societies. Building the capacities of citizens and civil groups to respond to such a new environment with creative and innovative instruments is of paramount importance for their sustainable development.

    Our work focuses on researching Web3 technology, digital preservation of collective memory and history in conflict and post-conflict areas, and resilience of rule of law institutions and cultures in non-democratic regimes.

    Enquiry: info.ril@proton.me

  • RIL Newsletter #2025-7

    RIL Newsletter #2025-7

    Welcome to Resilience Innovation Lab (RIL) ! In this newsletter, we will discuss the latest development of information access in Hong Kong, and share our latest reports and events in London, UK.

    Increasing Constraints on the Information Environment in Hong Kong

    The information environment in Hong Kong has been further tightened in light of recent developments. The Ombudsman, traditionally regarded as a government watchdog, has removed decades’ worth of annual and investigative reports, along with other documents dated prior to 2023, from its website. The stated rationale for this action is the need for more effective website management.

    As a result, the publicly accessible archive of the Ombudsman’s reports has been reduced from the previous ten years to merely three. Access to reports predating 2023 is now restricted and only available upon written request. Lawmakers from the “patriots-only” legislature have criticised this move, viewing it as a step backwards in terms of transparency and access to public information. Even Patrick Nip, former Secretary for the Civil Service in Hong Kong, commented that good governance “emphasises transparency, public engagement, and accountability”.

    In response, the Ombudsman defended the decision as an effort to enhance the user experience of its website. However, this explanation has failed to alleviate public concerns that access to government data is being increasingly curtailed at the expense of transparency and accountability. The move also mirrors common strategies employed by authoritarian regimes to censor and control the flow of information.

    Meanwhile, information professionals—particularly journalists—are facing new forms of harassment from government agencies. This week, the Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA) held a press conference alleging that the city’s tax authorities had targeted at least 20 journalists, including current or former media executives and their family members, with audits conducted without sufficient evidence.

    The head of the HKJA argued that such actions by the government “do have a negative effect on Hong Kong’s press freedom… Press freedom not only means the ability for media and journalists to operate safely, physically… It also involves the business environment—whether it is sustainable for them to continue operating.” Reporters Without Borders, an NGO that monitors global press freedom, condemned the actions of the Hong Kong government as an “intimidation tactic to dissuade independent journalists from reporting”.

    Administrative harassment is a well-known tactic employed by authoritarian governments to intimidate critics and dissenters using regulatory and legal measures, often under the guise of commercial or civil procedures. Such tactics allow governments to exert pressure on targeted individuals—many of whom may have limited resources—without formally charging them with speech-related offences.

    Report Launch: Safeguarding Freedom of Information in Hong Kong

    The recent developments serve to confirm the concerns we raised in our earlier report.

    Our research publication, Safeguarding Freedom of Information in Hong Kong: Challenges, Opportunities and Remedies, systematically outlines how Hong Kong’s information access environment has been significantly constrained since the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law (HKNSL) in 2020 and the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance (SNSO) in 2024. These measures have severely curtailed press freedom and undermined the ability of civil society to hold the government accountable. They have encouraged the withholding of publicly available data and represent a departure from international human rights standards.

    Access to and dissemination of information is increasingly criminalised, resulting in diminished government transparency, suppression of the media, and reduced accessibility to data for businesses. The repercussions are being felt by journalists, the business sector, researchers, and international organisations alike.

    We encourage you to share this report with stakeholders in your network and to continue monitoring the authorities’ performance in upholding the freedom to access and disseminate information.

    Download the Chinese version of the report here.

    Download the English version of the report here.

    Event Invitation: “Ways of Remembering”

    Resilience Innovation Lab is pleased to collaborate with Hong Kong Action Archives for the following exhibition event: Ways of Remembering.

    This exhibition brings together artefacts, personal stories, and collective memories from Hong Kong’s social movements over the past decades. Alongside these, we’re shedding light on projects that employ archiving as a means of resistance.

    ​

    More than just a look at Hong Kong, this exhibition is an invitation for anyone interested in the act of collecting, remembering, and the ways in which history is written. It’s for anyone who wants to explore how our voices — and the voices of our communities — are shaped by the currents of time and information.

    𝙁𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙤𝙬 𝙖𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙨 𝙬𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩’𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙚𝙭𝙝𝙞𝙗𝙞𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣.

    𓂃𓂃𓂃𓂃𓂃𓂃𓂃𓂃𓂃

    𝚆𝙰𝚈𝚂 𝙾𝙵 𝚁𝙴𝙼𝙴𝙼𝙱𝙴𝚁𝙸𝙽𝙶

    ✧ *:・゚記憶對視 *:・゚✧

    ● 𝟷𝟽 → 𝟸𝟼 𝙼𝚊𝚢 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟻

    ● 𝙰𝚛𝚌𝚑 𝟺𝟶𝟸 𝙲𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚂𝚝,

    𝙻𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗 𝙴𝟸 𝟾𝙷𝙳, 𝚄𝙺

    𝙻𝚎𝚝’𝚜 𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝

    𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚢,

    𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚖,

    𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝙷𝚘𝚗𝚐 𝙺𝚘𝚗𝚐.

    Presented and curated by Hong Kong Action Archives, in collaboration with Amnesty International, Resilience Innovation Lab, and The Rights Practice.

    The last day of the exhibition is on 26 May 2025 (Monday, bank holiday in the UK). You are cordinally invited to visit the exhibition and its side events, which can be found in the Eventbrite website below.

    Eventbrite Event Details: Click here .

    #WaysOfRemembering2025

    #HKAAinUK

    Useful Resources

    Judicial Records in Hong Kong * has made every effort to collect court decisions related to the Anti-Extradition Bill Movement for educational and research purposes. These records are still accessible on the website of Hong Kong’s judiciary, but their continued availability to the public in the future remains uncertain. All judicial records collected and displayed here are secured and maintained using blockchain technology, through which they are decentralized and immutable, ensuring transparency, tamper-resistance, and trust in the integrity of the data. Our goal is to utilize blockchain as a form of censorship resistance to preserve invaluable public records. If there are any omissions in this database, please feel free to notify RIL’s research team: info.dap@protonmail.com .

    China Open Courts * aims to preserve and provide public access to judicial records from the People’s Republic of China that are at risk of disappearing from official sources. Below is an overview of the methodology adopted in this project, including our data collection strategies, scope of coverage, and plans for ensuring continued accuracy and relevance of the information. Interested parties are welcome to reach out to our team at chinaopencourts@protonmail.com for further information, collaboration opportunities, or suggestions on additional keywords and topics to include.

    *To protect your identity and personal information, you are advised to use these online resources with an encrypted device and VPN.

    An Unbreakable Wall? Challenges and Opportunities of Defending Freedom of Information in China is RIL’s first research report on information environment in China. This report provides a comprehensive account of China’s information environment under the rule of the CCP. Drawing on evidence-based insights from multiple perspectives, the report seeks to inform a broad range of stakeholders—from policymakers and international businesses to civil society organisations and academic institutions—and encourages collaborative efforts to address the challenges posed by China’s information landscape and its impact on global information networks. The full report is now available on our website.

    Who we are?

    Resilience Innovation Lab (RIL) was founded by Asian veteran researchers and human rights defenders in 2023. RIL is a virtual platform promoting innovation, experimentation, and the exchange of research and educational initiatives that aim to develop and strengthen the democratic and digital resilience of organisations and individuals working in repressive environments.

    RIL envisions a synergy of democracy, technology and civil society resilience today, especially when authoritarianism emerges as a common threat to liberal democracies and open societies. Building the capacities of citizens and civil groups to respond to such a new environment with creative and innovative instruments is of paramount importance for their sustainable development.

    Our work focuses on researching Web3 technology, digital preservation of collective memory and history in conflict and post-conflict areas, and resilience of rule of law institutions and cultures in non-democratic regimes.

  • Increasing Constraints on the Information Environment in Hong Kong

    Increasing Constraints on the Information Environment in Hong Kong

    The information environment in Hong Kong has been further tightened in light of recent developments. The Ombudsman, traditionally regarded as a government watchdog, has removed decades’ worth of annual and investigative reports, along with other documents dated prior to 2023, from its website. The stated rationale for this action is the need for more effective website management.

    As a result, the publicly accessible archive of the Ombudsman’s reports has been reduced from the previous ten years to merely three. Access to reports predating 2023 is now restricted and only available upon written request. Lawmakers from the “patriots-only” legislature have criticised this move, viewing it as a step backwards in terms of transparency and access to public information. Even Patrick Nip, former Secretary for the Civil Service in Hong Kong, commented that good governance “emphasises transparency, public engagement, and accountability”.

    In response, the Ombudsman defended the decision as an effort to enhance the user experience of its website. However, this explanation has failed to alleviate public concerns that access to government data is being increasingly curtailed at the expense of transparency and accountability. The move also mirrors common strategies employed by authoritarian regimes to censor and control the flow of information.

    Meanwhile, information professionals—particularly journalists—are facing new forms of harassment from government agencies. This week, the Hong Kong Journalists Association (HKJA) held a press conference alleging that the city’s tax authorities had targeted at least 20 journalists, including current or former media executives and their family members, with audits conducted without sufficient evidence.

    The head of the HKJA argued that such actions by the government “do have a negative effect on Hong Kong’s press freedom… Press freedom not only means the ability for media and journalists to operate safely, physically… It also involves the business environment—whether it is sustainable for them to continue operating.” Reporters Without Borders, an NGO that monitors global press freedom, condemned the actions of the Hong Kong government as an “intimidation tactic to dissuade independent journalists from reporting”.

    Administrative harassment is a well-known tactic employed by authoritarian governments to intimidate critics and dissenters using regulatory and legal measures, often under the guise of commercial or civil procedures. Such tactics allow governments to exert pressure on targeted individuals—many of whom may have limited resources—without formally charging them with speech-related offences.

    The recent developments serve to confirm the concerns we raised in our earlier report.

    We encourage you to share this report with stakeholders in your network and to continue monitoring the authorities’ performance in upholding the freedom to access and disseminate information.

    Download the Chinese version of the report here.

    Download the English version of the report here.

    香港資訊環境進一步收緊

    隨着近期發展,香港的資訊環境進一步收緊。素有政府監察機構之稱的申訴專員公署,近日從其網站上移除了數十年來的年報與調查報告,以及2023年前的其他文件,理由是網站管理需更有效率。

    此舉將原本可供公眾瀏覽的申訴專員報告紀錄由過去的十年縮減至僅三年,2023年前的紀錄如今只能透過書面申請索取。來自「愛國者治港」立法會的議員批評此舉為削弱透明度及限制公眾獲取資料的倒退行為。就連前公務員事務局局長聶德權亦指出,良好管治「強調透明度、公眾參與及問責」。

    對此,申訴專員公署回應稱有關決定旨在提升網站的用戶體驗。然而,此解釋未能釋除公眾對政府資料獲取權益不斷削弱的憂慮。有關做法亦呼應了威權政權常見的手法——審查與控制資訊流通。

    另一方面,資訊專業人士,特別是新聞工作者,亦面對政府機關的新型騷擾行為。本週,香港記者協會(HKJA)召開記者會,指控本地稅務機關在缺乏足夠證據下,對至少20名記者,包括現任或前任媒體高層及其家屬,進行審計。

    記協主席表示,政府的行為「的確對香港新聞自由帶來負面影響……新聞自由不僅意味著記者和媒體能在身體上安全地工作……亦涉及營運環境,即他們是否有可持續的條件繼續經營」。國際新聞自由組織「無國界記者」則譴責港府此舉為「恐嚇手段,旨在阻嚇獨立記者繼續報導」。

    行政騷擾是威權政府常用的策略之一,透過商業或民事程序中的監管與法律手段來打壓異見與對手,而非以言論相關罪名起訴。此類壓力策略可令資源有限的目標人士承受巨大壓力,同時避免招致更明顯的政治非難。

    上述的發展,正印證我們在早前發表的報告所表達的憂慮。

    我們鼓勵大家與你認識的持分者分享這份報告,持續監察當局在保障資訊自由和傳播資訊自由的表現。

    報告全文(中文版):按此下載

    報告全文(英文版):按此下載

  • Berkeley Protocol – Archival Activism and Advocacy

    Berkeley Protocol – Archival Activism and Advocacy

    The Berkeley Protocol on Digital Open Source Investigations (The Protocol) is a pioneering initiative aimed at standardising the use of open-source information in investigations into human rights abuses and war crimes. Developed by the Human Rights Center at the University of California, Berkeley, it represents a significant step forward in the ethical and legal use of open-source intelligence (OSINT), including content collected from social media posts, videos, and other publicly accessible online sources. This framework is essential for helping investigators collect, verify, and present evidence in a way that meets international legal standards—an essential process for holding perpetrators of human rights violations accountable.

    The Protocol addresses the challenges and complexities of verifying visual content—such as photographs and videos—to ensure authenticity and reliability. In crisis situations, digital evidence captured by ordinary citizens on smartphones can be highly impactful—provided it is properly verified. The Protocol outlines procedures for confirming the source, location, and timing of such content, ensuring it can be effectively used in legal proceedings. Methods such as geolocation and chronolocation help prevent the spread of misinformation and strengthen the credibility of evidence used in human rights investigations.

    Blockchain technology has the potential to complement the Berkeley Protocol by offering a secure and tamper-proof platform for archiving crucial open-source data. In the context of archival activism, blockchain can be used to safeguard sensitive information collected during human rights investigations. Its decentralised nature ensures that once data is recorded, it cannot be altered or deleted without consensus—preserving the integrity of evidence. This is particularly valuable in documenting war crimes or human rights abuses, where the risk of evidence being tampered with or destroyed by malicious actors is high.

    The goal of archival activism is to preserve vital information that might otherwise be lost or suppressed. Blockchain offers a powerful solution to this challenge. By storing open-source evidence on blockchain networks, activists and investigators can ensure that information remains accessible and unaltered—even in the face of efforts by authoritarian regimes or other actors to suppress it. This decentralised archiving approach aligns with the principles of the Berkeley Protocol, which emphasises reliability and transparency in the collection and use of open-source data.

    The use of blockchain in human rights investigations also fosters greater collaboration among activists, legal professionals, and researchers. The technology’s transparency and decentralisation enable multiple parties to access and verify evidence without requiring a central authority, enhancing trust and cooperation in the investigative process. This is particularly significant in international contexts, where organisations may collaborate to document and prosecute human rights violations. By offering a shared, tamper-proof evidence ledger, blockchain enhances the credibility of collected information and supports the aims of the Protocol.

    Moreover, blockchain can help address a major challenge identified by the Protocol: the fleeting nature of digital content. Social media platforms often remove content deemed too violent or in violation of policies, risking the loss of critical evidence. By archiving such material on the blockchain, investigators can ensure that vital information is preserved even after removal from online platforms. This helps maintain a complete record of events and ensures the voices of those affected by human rights violations are not silenced.

    The Protocol also highlights ethical considerations in the collection and use of open-source data. Blockchain’s inherent transparency can address some of these concerns by providing a clear chain of custody for digital evidence. This means that the origin and handling of each piece of evidence can be traced, ensuring it has not been tampered with and that its use adheres to ethical standards. Such accountability is crucial in high-risk human rights investigations, where the consequences of using unreliable evidence can be severe.

    Beyond archiving and verification, blockchain also has a role to play in human rights advocacy, drawing public attention to abuses. By creating a permanent and publicly accessible record of evidence, blockchain can amplify the stories of victims and raise international awareness of ongoing crises. This aligns with the goals of the Protocol—not only to support legal accountability but also to increase public recognition of human rights violations and promote social justice. Blockchain platforms can be used to share verified evidence with the public, journalists, and advocacy organisations, ensuring that truth is not buried and that responsible parties are held accountable.

    The integration of the Protocol’s open-source investigation guidelines with blockchain’s secure archiving and transparency capabilities creates a powerful toolset for safeguarding open-source data and supporting human rights advocacy. By ensuring that evidence is both credible and accessible, this approach strengthens the case against violators and supports efforts to seek justice for victims. In this context, blockchain enhances the integrity of evidence and empowers activists and investigators to continue their work in the face of adversity.

    In conclusion, the Protocol provides a much-needed framework for the ethical and effective use of open-source information in human rights investigations. By incorporating blockchain technology into this process, archival activists can ensure that key evidence is preserved, protected, and used to promote accountability and justice. This innovative approach to archival activism holds the potential to transform the field of human rights investigation, offering new tools and methodologies for documenting abuses and advocating for change.

    Read more: Web3-backed Digital Archiving: User Guide For Beginners (Chinese Only)

    檔案行動主義與倡導 -《柏克萊數位開源調查協議》

    《柏克萊數位開源調查協議》 (The Berkeley Protocol on Digital Open Source Investigation) 是一項開創性的倡議,旨在規範在調查人權侵害和戰爭罪行中使用開源信息。該協議由加州大學柏克萊分校人權中心制定,代表了在道德和法律上使用開源情報(OSINT)的重大進步,這些情報包括從社交媒體帖子、視頻和其他公開可訪問的在線內容中收集的信息。這一框架對於幫助調查人員以符合國際法律標準的方式收集、驗證和呈現證據至關重要,這對於追究人權侵害加害者的責任至關重要。

    《柏克萊協議》針對驗證視覺內容(如照片和視頻)的挑戰和複雜性,以確保其真實性和可靠性。在危機事件中,普通公民使用智能手機記錄的數碼證據可能具有很大的影響力,但前提是它們得到了適當的驗證。該協議制定了驗證此類內容的來源、位置和時間的程序,確保其能夠在法律程序中有效使用。這一驗證過程,包括地理定位和時間定位等方法,有助於防止錯誤信息的傳播,並加強人權調查中使用的證據的可信度。

    區塊鏈技術有可能通過提供一個安全且不可更改的平台來補充《柏克萊協議》,用於存檔重要的開源數據。在檔案行動主義的背景下,可以利用區塊鏈來保護在人權調查中收集的敏感信息。區塊鏈的去中心化性質確保一旦數據被記錄,就不能在未經共識的情況下被更改或刪除,這對於維護證據的完整性至關重要。這在記錄戰爭罪行或人權侵害時尤為有價值,因為惡意行為者篡改或刪除證據的風險很高。

    檔案行動主義的目標是保存那些可能會丟失或被壓制的重要信息,而區塊鏈技術為這一挑戰提供了強大的解決方案。通過將開源證據存儲在區塊鏈上,活動家和調查人員可以確保這些信息在面對試圖壓制犯罪證據的威權政權或其他實體時保持可訪問且未被篡改。這種去中心化的存檔方式符合《柏克萊協議》的原則,強調在收集和使用開源數據時的可靠性和透明性。

    在人權調查中使用區塊鏈技術還促進了行動者、法律專業人士和研究人員之間更大的合作。區塊鏈的透明和去中心化特性允許多方在無需中央權威的情況下訪問和驗證證據,從而促進調查過程中的信任與合作。這在國際背景下尤為重要,因為不同的組織可能會共同努力記錄和起訴人權侵害行為。通過提供一個共享的、防篡改的證據分類帳,區塊鏈可以增強所收集信息的可信度,並支持《柏克萊協議》的目標。

    此外,區塊鏈可以幫助解決《柏克萊協議》所指出的一個主要挑戰:電子信息的短暫性。社交媒體公司經常會刪除被認為內容過於暴力或違反其政策的內容,這可能導致寶貴證據的丟失。通過將此類內容存檔在區塊鏈上,調查人員可以確保重要信息即使在社交媒體平台上被刪除後仍然得到保存。這不僅有助於保持對事件的全面記錄,還確保那些受到人權侵害的人們的聲音不會被消音。

    《柏克萊協議》還強調在收集和使用開源數據過程中的倫理考量。區塊鏈技術具有內在的透明性,能夠通過提供電子證據的清晰保管鏈來解決一些這樣的倫理問題。這意味著每個證據的來源和處理過程都可以被追蹤,確保其未被篡改,並且其使用符合倫理準則。這種級別的問責在人權調查中至關重要,因為風險極高,使用不可靠證據的後果可能非常嚴重。

    除了在存檔和驗證中的作用外,區塊鏈還可以在倡導人權方面發揮作用,吸引公眾對人權侵害行為的關注。通過創建永久且公開可訪問的證據記錄,區塊鏈可以幫助放大受害者的故事,並將國際關注引向持續的危機。這與《柏克萊協議》的目標一致,不僅支持法律問責,還提高人們對人權侵害的認識,並促進社會正義。由於區塊鏈的平台可以用於與公眾、記者和倡導組織分享經過驗證的證據,確保真相不被隱瞞,並讓那些負有責任的人受到追究。

    《柏克萊協議》的開源調查指南與區塊鏈在安全存檔和透明性方面的能力相結合,創造了一種強有力的工具來保護開源數據並支持人權倡導。通過確保證據既可靠又可訪問,這一方法可以幫助對人權侵害者建立更有力的案件,並支持為受害者爭取正義的努力。在這一背景下使用區塊鏈不僅提高了證據的完整性,還使行動者和調查人員能夠在面對挑戰時繼續他們的工作。

    總之,《柏克萊開源調查協議》為在人權調查中具道德且有效地使用開源信息提供了一個急需的框架。通過將區塊鏈技術整合到這一過程中,檔案行動者可以確保關鍵證據得到保存、保護並用於促進問責和正義。這種創新的檔案行動主義方法有可能改變人權調查領域,為記錄侵害行為和倡導變革提供新的工具和方法。

    閱讀更多:《「無大台」式資料記錄:Web3檔案保存入門手冊》